Safety and efficacy of continuous subcutaneous levodopa-carbidopa infusion (ND0612) for Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations (BouNDless): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Conventional oral levodopa therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease can be associated with variations in plasma concentrations. Levodopa infusion strategies might provide more consistent drug delivery and fewer motor fluctuations. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a continuous 24 h/day subcutaneous infusion of ND0612 (a levodopa-carbidopa solution) compared with oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa for the treatment of motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicentre trial at 117 academic and community neurology sites in 16 countries, including in Europe, Israel, and the USA. Eligible participants were men and women aged 30 years or older with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤3 in the on state) who experienced at least 2·5 h/day of off time. Participants underwent an open-label run-in phase (<12 weeks), during which time optimal regimens were established for both oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa and for 24 h/day subcutaneous ND0612 infusion (levodopa-carbidopa 60·0/7·5 mg/mL), with supplemental oral levodopa-carbidopa if needed. Participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with their optimised regimen of either subcutaneous ND0612 or oral levodopa-carbidopa, with matching oral or subcutaneous placebo given as required to maintain blinding. Randomisation was done via an interactive web response system, stratified by region, using a permuted block schedule. Participants, study partners, treating investigators, study site personnel, and the sponsor were masked to treatment group allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (ie, time of randomisation, when all patients were receiving an optimised open-label ND0612 regimen) to end of the double-blind phase in total daily on time without troublesome dyskinesia, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04006210, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 30, 2019, and April 8, 2022, 381 participants were enrolled, of whom 259 (68%) were randomly assigned, 128 (49%) to subcutaneous ND0612 and 131 (51%) to oral levodopa-carbidopa. 243 (94%) participants completed the study. Treatment with subcutaneous ND0612 provided an additional 1·72 h (95% CI 1·08 to 2·36) of on time without troublesome dyskinesia compared with oral levodopa-carbidopa (change from baseline of -0·48 h [-0·94 to -0·02] with subcutaneous ND0612 vs -2·20 h [-2·65 to -1·74] with oral levodopa-carbidopa; p<0·0001). Significant treatment differences favouring subcutaneous ND0612 were also found in the first four of nine prespecified hierarchical outcomes of daily off time (-1·40 h [95% CI -1·99 to -0·80]), Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II scores (-3·05 [-4·28 to -1·81]), Patients Global Impression of Change (odds ratio [OR] 5·31 [2·67 to 10·58]), and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (OR 7·23 [3·57 to 14·64]). Hierarchical testing ended after the fourth secondary endpoint. Adverse events were reported by 287 (89%) of 322 participants during open-label ND0612 optimisation, and by 103 (80%) of 128 in the ND0612 group and 97 (74%) of 131 in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group during the double-blind phase. The most common adverse events were infusion-site reactions (266 [83%] participants during open-label ND0612, and 73 [57%] in the ND0612 group vs 56 [43%] in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group during the double-blind phase), most of which were mild. Serious adverse events in four participants in the ND0612 group were related to study treatment (infusion-site cellulitis [n=2], infusion-site abscess and infusion-site ulcer [n=1]; and paraesthesia and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy [n=1]). One participant in the ND0612 group died during the double-blind phase, but the death was not related to study treatment (fall leading to traumatic brain injury). INTERPRETATION: Results of this phase 3 study showed that subcutaneous ND0612 used in combination with oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa increased on time without troublesome dyskinesia and reduced off time, with a favourable benefit-risk profile. ND0612 might offer a safe and efficacious subcutaneous levodopa infusion approach to managing motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease. The ongoing open-label extension phase will provide further information on the long-term efficacy and safety of treatment. FUNDING: NeuroDerm.

The pharmacokinetics of continuous subcutaneous levodopa/carbidopa infusion: Findings from the ND0612 clinical development program.

Background: While treatment with levodopa remains the cornerstone of Parkinson's disease (PD) management, chronic oral therapy is often associated with the development of motor complications, that correlate to fluctuating levodopa plasma concentrations, limiting its clinical utility. Continuous infusion is considered to be the optimal delivery route for treating PD patients with motor fluctuations, but current infusion systems require invasive surgery. Subcutaneous infusion of (SC) levodopa has the potential to provide a better tolerated and more convenient route of continuous levodopa delivery. ND0612 is in development as a combination product providing continuous levodopa/carbidopa via a minimally invasive, subcutaneous delivery system for PD patients experiencing motor response fluctuations. We present pharmacokinetic results from a series of studies that analyzed plasma concentrations after SC levodopa delivery with ND0612 to inform the clinical development program. Methods: We performed a series of six Phase I and II studies to characterize the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and carbidopa derived from ND0612 infusion with/without adjunct oral therapy of the same ingredients. These studies were conducted in healthy volunteers and in PD patients experiencing motor response fluctuations while on their current levodopa therapy regimen. Results: Taken together, the results demonstrate dose-proportionality dependent on rate of subcutaneous levodopa infusion leading to stable and sustained plasma concentrations of levodopa. Subcutaneous infusion of ND0612 administered with oral levodopa/carbidopa maintained near-constant, therapeutic levodopa plasma concentrations, thereby avoiding the troughs in levodopa plasma concentrations that are associated with OFF time in PD. The data generated in this series of studies also confirmed that a levodopa/carbidopa dose ratio of 8:1 would be the most reasonable choice for ND0612 development. Conclusions: This series of clinical pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that ND0612, administered continuously with a levodopa concentration of 60 mg/ml combined with carbidopa 7.5 mg/ml, and complemented with oral levodopa/carbidopa, is suitable for 24 h continuous administration in patients with PD. The stable plasma concentrations of levodopa achieved predict utility of ND0612 as a parenteral formulation for achieving clinically useful delivery of levodopa for PD patients.

Phenytoin Metabolic Ratio, a Marker of CYP2C9 Activity, is Superior to the CYP2C9 Genotype as a Predictor of (S)-Warfarin Clearance.

BACKGROUND: CYP2C9 is a member of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily responsible for the metabolism of 16% of drugs that undergo oxidative metabolism. The activity of CYP2C9 exhibits marked inter-individual variability, which translates into prominent differences in the pharmacokinetics of CYP2C9 substrates, some of which are characterized by a narrow therapeutic window. Genetic polymorphisms in the gene encoding for CYP2C9 account for a fraction of the variability in CYP2C9 activity. The phenytoin metabolic ratio (PMR) is a marker of CYP2C9 activity in vivo, which correlates with CYP2C9 genetic polymorphisms. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the ability of the PMR to predict the oral clearance of (S)-warfarin (SWOCL) and its formation clearance towards its CYP2C9-mediated metabolites (SWCLf) [i.e., 6- and 7-hydroxy-(S)-warfarin]. METHODS: The study was conducted in 150 healthy non-smoker subjects (segment 1) and 60 patients treated with warfarin (segment 2). In the first segment, the participants received on two separate occasions a single 300-mg dose of phenytoin and at least 7 days later a single dose of warfarin (5 or 10 mg). The same PMR procedure was performed in the second segment, except that it was performed either before warfarin initiation or after the patients had reached stable anticoagulation. The PMR was derived from the ratio of 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenyl-hydantoin content in a 24-hour urine collection to plasma phenytoin concentration 12- (PMR24/12) or 24- (PMR24/24) post-dosing. In segment 1, SWOCL was calculated from the ratio of (S)-warfarin dose to the warfarin area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and the SWCLf from the ratio of urine content of 6- and 7-hydroxy-(S)-warfarin to (S)-warfarin area under the (S)-warfarin plasma concentration-time curve until the last measured timepoint. In segment 2, estimated SWOCL was derived from the ratio of (S)-warfarin dose to the mid-interval plasma concentration of (S)-warfarin. RESULTS: The PMR, SWOCL, and SWCLf varied significantly between carriers of different CYP2C9 genotypes in both healthy subjects (p < 0.001) and patients (p < 0.005). However, PMR and SWOCL values exhibited substantial intra-genotypic variability. PMR24/12 and PMR24/24 were significantly correlated with SWOCL both in healthy subjects (r = 0.62 and r = 0.67, respectively, p < 0.001) and in patients (r = 0.57 and r = 0.61, respectively, p < 0.001). In a multiple regression model that included all variables that correlated with SWOCL, PMR was the strongest predictor, explaining 44% and 38% of the variability in SWOCL among healthy subjects and patients, respectively, and accounting for 95.7% (44%/46%) and 90.5% (38%/42%) of the total explained variability in SWOCL among healthy subjects and patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PMR is the strongest predictor of SWOCL, and as such, it exhibits a significant advantage over the CYP2C9 genotype. The inclusion of PMR in future dosing algorithms of CYP2C9 substrates characterized by a narrow therapeutic window should be encouraged and further investigated.

ND0612 (levodopa/carbidopa for subcutaneous infusion) in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor response fluctuations: A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.

INTRODUCTION: ND0612 is a continuous, subcutaneous levodopa/carbidopa delivery system under development for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor fluctuations. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 2-period study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of ND0612 in PD patients on an optimized oral levodopa regimen and experiencing ≥2 h/day of OFF time. During Period-1, patients received their current standard of care (SoC) levodopa/carbidopa and were randomized (2:1) to 14 days treatment with adjunct ND0612 (daily levodopa/carbidopa dose of 270/63 mg) or placebo infusion +SoC. During Period-2, 16 patients were randomized to receive 7 days treatment with ND0612 or ND0612 plus oral entacapone. Reduction in OFF time was analyzed as an exploratory measure using a futility design with a predefined margin of 1.6 h. RESULTS: ND0612 was well-tolerated; most patients experienced infusion site nodules (95% vs. 56% with placebo), which all resolved without sequelae. Patients treated with adjunct ND0612 during Period-1 avoided deep troughs in levodopa plasma levels and had a decreased fluctuation index versus placebo (1.6 ± 0.5 vs 3.1 ± 1.6 at end of Period-1, respectively). In Period-2, the coadministration of entacapone with continuous ND0612 SC infusion translated to an increase in mean levodopa AUC0-10h compared to baseline. Exploratory efficacy analysis of Period 1 showed mean ± SD OFF time reductions of -2.13 ± 2.24 [90%CI: -2.8, ∞] hours (p = 0.84 using H0 of µ0 ≤-1.6). CONCLUSION: Levodopa/carbidopa infusion with ND0612 was generally well-tolerated and resulted in reduced fluctuations in plasma levodopa concentrations when given with SoC oral levodopa. ND0612 met the efficacy endpoint for the futility design.

Subcutaneous Levodopa Infusion for Parkinson's Disease: 1-Year Data from the Open-Label BeyoND Study.

BACKGROUND: Continuous, subcutaneous (SC) levodopa/carbidopa infusion with ND0612 is under development as a treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor fluctuations. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate 1-year safety data. METHODS: BeyoND is an open-label study evaluating the long-term safety of two ND0612 dosing regimens. RESULTS: Of the 214 enrolled patients (24-hour SC infusion: n = 90; 16-hour SC infusion: n = 124), 120 (56%) completed 12 months of treatment. Leading causes for study discontinuation were consent withdrawal (19.6%) and adverse events (17.3%). Rates of discontinuation were reduced from 49% to 29% after a protocol revision and retraining. Systemic safety was typical for PD patients treated with levodopa/carbidopa. Most patients experienced infusion site reactions, particularly nodules (30.8%) and hematoma (25.2%), which were judged mostly mild to moderate and led to discontinuation in only 10.3% of the participants. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous levodopa/carbidopa continuous infusion with ND0612 is generally safe, with typical infusion site reactions for SC delivery as the main adverse event. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Continuous Subcutaneous Levodopa Delivery for Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: ND0612 is a continuous, subcutaneous levodopa/carbidopa delivery system in development for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuationsObjective:Evaluate the efficacy and safety of two ND0612 dosing regimens in patients with PD. METHODS: This was a 28-day open-label study (NCT02577523) in PD patients with ≥2.5 hours/day of OFF time despite optimized treatment. Patients were randomized to treatment with either a 24-hour infusion (levodopa/carbidopa dose of 720/90 mg) or a 14-hour 'waking-day' infusion (levodopa/carbidopa dose of 538/68 mg plus a morning oral dose of 150/15 mg). Supplemental oral doses of levodopa were permitted for patients in both groups if required. In-clinic assessments of OFF time (primary endpoint) and ON time with or without dyskinesia were determined by a blinded rater over 8 hours (normalized to 16 hours). RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were randomized and 33 (87%) completed the study. Compared to baseline, OFF time for the overall population was reduced by a least squares (LS) mean[95% CI] of 2.0[- 3.3, - 0.7] hours (p = 0.003). ON time with no/mild dyskinesia (no troublesome dyskinesia) was increased from baseline by a LS mean of 3.3[2.0, 4.6] hours (p < 0.0001), and ON time with moderate/severe dyskinesia was reduced by a LS mean of 1.2[- 1.8, - 0.5] hours (p≤0.001). Reduction in OFF time was larger in the 24-hour group (- 2.8[- 4.6, - 0.9] hours; p = 0.004) than in the 14-hour group (- 1.3[- 3.1, 0.5] hours; p = 0.16). Complete resolution of OFF time was observed in 42% (n = 8) of patients in the 24-hour group. Infusion site reactions were the most common adverse event. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of continuous subcutaneous delivery of levodopa as a treatment for PD and provides preliminary evidence of efficacy.

ND0701, A Novel Formulation of Apomorphine for Subcutaneous Infusion, in Comparison to a Commercial Apomorphine Formulation: 28-Day Pharmacokinetic Study in Minipigs and a Phase I Study in Healthy Volunteers to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous apomorphine is used for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD); however, infusion site reactions are a common adverse event (AE), which can lead to treatment discontinuation. Apomorphine formulations that are more tolerable and convenient for use are needed. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the toxicity and bioavailability of ND0701, a new concentrated formulation of apomorphine free base, with one of the commercially available apomorphine HCl formulations (APO-go®, Britannia Pharmaceuticals Ltd). METHODS: (1) Preclinical study: 16 minipigs were randomly assigned to placebo, APO-go®, and ND0701 groups, and treated for 28 days. Pharmacokinetic, clinical, and pathological assessments were performed. (2) Phase I study: 18 healthy volunteers participated in an open-label, two-sequence, randomized, three single-dose, partial crossover study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of ND0701 with APO-go® (1%). RESULTS: (1) Preclinical study: No systemic toxicity was observed in apomorphine-treated minipigs, but local skin reactions were observed at the infusion sites. These effects were less frequent and less severe and recovery was more rapid for ND0701 compared with APO-go®. (2) Phase I study: Both formulations were safe and well tolerated under the conditions of the study and no severe or serious treatment-emergent AEs were reported. Infusion site nodules were reported more frequently, with higher severity, and recovered slower at APO-go®-treated sites compared with ND0701-treated sites. Bioavailability of apomorphine was comparable between the two formulations. CONCLUSION: Based on these pilot studies, ND0701 appears to be superior to APO-go® in terms of tolerability and safety, while maintaining comparable bioavailability with APO-go®, and shows promise as a future treatment for PD.

Bioequivalence of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride extended-release capsule taken intact or sprinkled over applesauce
.

OBJECTIVE: Difficulty swallowing pills can compromise pain control in painful musculoskeletal disorders. This open-label, 2-period crossover study assessed pharmacokinetics and safety of cyclobenzaprine extended-release (CER) 30-mg capsule contents sprinkled over applesauce compared with intact capsules in healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 32 subjects were randomized to treatment sequences AB or BA (A = single CER intact capsule; B = single CER capsule contents sprinkled over applesauce (15 mL)). Treatments were separated by a ≥ 14-day washout. Pharmacokinetic assessments included maximum observed plasma drug concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), time to first quantifiable plasma drug concentration (tlag), and area under the plasma drug concentration-vs.-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable drug concentration (AUC0-t) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞). Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric least squares (LS) means ratios of B:A of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 80 - 125%. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Mean plasma drug concentration-vs.-time profiles were similar for CER intact and sprinkled over applesauce. The 90% CIs of LS means ratios indicated bioequivalence: Cmax 91.96 - 100.76%, AUC0-t 96.18 - 103.50%, and AUC0-∞ 95.70 - 103.07%. Median tmax was not significantly different (p > 0.05), and median tlag was the same (1 hour). All adverse effects were mild and resolved during the study. No clinically meaningful changes were noted for clinical laboratory values. CONCLUSION: CER capsules intact and sprinkled over applesauce are bioequivalent. Sprinkling CER capsule contents is not expected to affect efficacy or safety and can, therefore, be an option for patients with musculoskeletal pain and difficulty swallowing capsules.
.

A Phase III Study of Balugrastim Versus Pegfilgrastim in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With Doxorubicin and Docetaxel.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-per-cycle balugrastim versus pegfilgrastim for neutrophil support in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS: Breast cancer patients (n = 256) were randomized to 40 or 50 mg of subcutaneous balugrastim or 6 mg of pegfilgrastim ≈24 hours after chemotherapy (60 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel, every 21 days for up to 4 cycles). The primary efficacy parameter was the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1. Secondary parameters included DSN (cycles 2-4), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir, febrile neutropenia rates, and time to ANC recovery (cycles 1-4). Safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity were assessed. RESULTS: Mean cycle 1 DSN was 1.0 day with 40 mg of balugrastim, 1.3 with 50 mg of balugrastim, and 1.2 with pegfilgrastim (upper limit of 95% confidence intervals for between-group DSN differences was <1.0 day for both balugrastim doses versus pegfilgrastim). Between-group efficacy parameters were comparable except for time to ANC recovery in cycle 1 (40 mg of balugrastim, 2.0 days; 50 mg of balugrastim, 2.1; pegfilgrastim, 2.6). Median terminal elimination half-life was ≈37 hours for 40 mg of balugrastim, ≈36 for 50 mg of balugrastim, and ≈45 for pegfilgrastim. Antibody response to balugrastim was low and transient, with no neutralizing effect. CONCLUSION: Once-per-cycle balugrastim is not inferior to pegfilgrastim in reducing cycle 1 DSN in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy; both drugs have comparable safety profiles. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This paper provides efficacy and safety data for a new, once-per-cycle granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, balugrastim, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In this phase III trial, balugrastim was shown to be not inferior to pegfilgrastim in the duration of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 of doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy, and the safety profiles of the two agents were similar. Once-per-cycle balugrastim is a safe and effective alternative to pegfilgrastim for hematopoietic support in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy associated with a greater than 20% risk of developing febrile neutropenia.

A thorough QT study to assess the effects of tbo-filgrastim on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects.

Tbo-filgrastim is a recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce the duration of severe neutropenia in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anticancer drugs associated with a clinically significant incidence of febrile neutropenia. We assessed the effect of tbo-filgrastim on cardiac conduction and repolarization in healthy subjects. A three-arm, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, double-blind study randomized healthy adults to a single 5 µg/kg intravenous tbo-filgrastim infusion, a single intravenous placebo infusion, or a single 400 mg moxifloxacin oral dose. The primary end point was placebo-corrected time-matched change from baseline in QT interval corrected using a QT individual correction (QTcI) method. Secondary end points included heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, change in electrocardiogram patterns, correlation between QTcI change from baseline (milliseconds) and tbo-filgrastim serum concentrations, and safety variables. A total of 145 subjects were enrolled (50 tbo-filgrastim, 50 placebo, 45 moxifloxacin). Peak placebo-corrected change from baseline for QTcI with tbo-filgrastim was 3.5 milliseconds, with a two-sided 95% upper confidence interval of 7.2 milliseconds, demonstrating no signal for any tbo-filgrastim effect on QTc. Concentration-effect modeling showed no evidence of an effect of tbo-filgrastim on cardiac repolarization. Tbo-filgrastim produced no clinically significant changes in other electrocardiogram parameters. Tbo-filgrastim was well tolerated.

Phase II dose-finding study of balugrastim in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Balugrastim is a once-per-cycle, fixed-dose recombinant protein comprising human serum albumin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor under development for prevention of severe neutropenia in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. This phase II, multicenter, active-controlled, dose-finding pilot study evaluated balugrastim safety and efficacy versus pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients scheduled to receive myelosuppressive chemotherapy and investigated two doses with similar efficacy to pegfilgrastim for a subsequent phase III study. Patients received four cycles of doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy and with each successive cycle were randomized sequentially to escalating doses of balugrastim [30 (n = 11), 40 (n = 21), or 50 mg (n = 20)] or a fixed dose of pegfilgrastim [6 mg (n = 26)] post-chemotherapy. Balugrastim doses were escalated as planned. The incidence of adverse events was similar among the balugrastim groups and between all balugrastim doses and pegfilgrastim. The most frequently reported adverse events were neutropenia, alopecia, and nausea. During cycle 1, severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count of <0.5 × 10(9)/L) occurred in 40, 67, and 50 % and febrile neutropenia occurred in 20.0, 9.5, and 10.0 % of patients receiving balugrastim 30, 40, and 50 mg, respectively; in patients receiving pegfilgrastim, 48 % experienced severe neutropenia and 8 % experienced febrile neutropenia. Duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) for each treatment group was 0.9, 1.6, 1.1, and 0.9 days, respectively. In the remaining three chemotherapy cycles, DSN was ≤1 day across all treatment groups. Balugrastim 50 mg was comparable to pegfilgrastim in terms of safety and overall efficacy in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

First-in-human, phase I/IIa dose-escalation and safety study of balugrastim in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety of balugrastim, a recombinant human serum albumin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), administered over a range of therapeutic doses in women with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin plus docetaxel chemotherapy. METHODS: The phase I, sequential dose-escalation first segment compared subcutaneous balugrastim 50, 150, 300, and 450 µg/kg during chemotherapy cycles 0-2. The randomized (2:2:1), open-label, phase IIa second segment compared balugrastim 300 or 450 µg/kg with pegfilgrastim 6 mg during chemotherapy cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: In the phase I segment, balugrastim was escalated to 450 µg/kg in 13 patients without dose-limiting toxicity. Three (9.7 %) of the 31 adverse events (AEs) reported in nine patients were grade 3 (agranulocytosis, vomiting, hypertension); none was grade 4. In the open-label phase IIa segment (N = 51), the majority of the 64 AEs reported in 31 (75.6 %) balugrastim-treated patients were grade 1 (59.4 %), with 39.1 % grade 2, 1.6 % grade 3 (one AE of vomiting), and none grade 4. Of the 16 AEs reported in seven (70.0 %) pegfilgrastim-treated patients, 87.5 % were grade 1, 6.3 % were grade 2, 6.3 % were grade 3 (one AE of thrombocytopenia), and none were grade 4. Overall, there were six bone pain AEs reported, one in the balugrastim 300 µg/kg group and five in the balugrastim 450 µg/kg group. No AEs in either study necessitated treatment interruption/discontinuation. The incidence and duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia were similar between balugrastim- and pegfilgrastim-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Balugrastim was well tolerated in this small population of breast cancer patients.

Efficacy and safety of balugrastim compared with pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) reduce the incidence and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia when given as adjunct therapy to patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Balugrastim is a long-acting G-CSF composed of a genetic fusion between recombinant human serum albumin and G-CSF. We compared the efficacy and safety of balugrastim and pegfilgrastim, a long-acting pegylated recombinant G-CSF, in patients with breast cancer who were scheduled to receive chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized phase III trial, patients with ≥ 1.5 × 10(9) neutrophils/L were randomly assigned to subcutaneous injections of balugrastim 40 mg (n = 153) or pegfilgrastim 6 mg (n = 151). The primary efficacy end point was the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) (days with an absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 0.5 × 10(9) cells/L) during cycle 1. Efficacy analyses were performed in the per-protocol (PP) population. In a separate open-label single-arm study, newly recruited patients (n = 77) received balugrastim 40 mg and were included in the safety analysis. RESULTS: The mean DSN in cycle 1 was 1.1 days in the balugrastim group and 1.0 days in the pegfilgrastim group (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.13-0.37). Two and 4 patients, respectively, had febrile neutropenia during cycle 1. Twenty percent of patients in the balugrastim group and 19% in the pegfilgrastim group had adverse events (AEs) considered to be related to study medication; 3.9% and 4.7% of patients, respectively, experienced serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the comparable safety and efficacy profile of balugrastim and pegfilgrastim and the noninferiority of balugrastim for reduction in DSN. There were no unexpected safety events.

Clinical pharmacology tyramine challenge study to determine the selectivity of the monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitor rasagiline.

Rasagiline is a selective, monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B inhibitor indicated for treatment of Parkinson's disease. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study determined the tyramine sensitivity factor (TSF) and degree of MAO-A inhibition (ie, reduction in plasma dihydroxyphenylglycol) in healthy volunteers who received phenelzine (15 mg, 3 times daily; positive control), selegiline (5 mg, twice daily), or rasagiline (1-6 mg, once daily) for 14 days or rasagiline 2 mg/d for 30 days. The selegiline/rasagiline groups were randomized to placebo or active drug. TSF was highest with phenelzine (17.3) and lowest with placebo (1.5). TSF with selegiline was 2.5. TSFs for rasagiline were as follows: 2.0 for 1 mg/d; 3.3 and 2.4 for 2 mg/d administered for 14 and 30 days, respectively; 4.5 for 4 mg/d; and 5.1 for 6 mg/d. Plasma dihydroxyphenylglycol concentrations suggested that rasagiline 1 mg/d had no effect, whereas rasagiline 2 mg/d had only minimal effect. In contrast, rasagiline 4 and 6 mg/d reduced dihydroxyphenylglycol to a degree approaching that achieved by the positive control phenelzine. Results demonstrate that rasagiline selectively inhibits MAO-B and is not associated with increased tyramine sensitivity at the indicated dose (1 mg/d). These data allowed removal of dietary tyramine restriction from rasagiline US labeling.

Effects of folic acid supplementation on the pharmacokinetics and anticoagulant effect of warfarin: an open-label, prospective study of long-term administration in adults.

BACKGROUND: Folic acid supplementation in patients with folic acid deficiency has been associated with increased clearance of phenytoin to its cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9-mediated metabolite, 5-(4'-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether folic acid supplementation increases the dosage requirement of the CYP2C9 substrate warfarin, and the formation clearance of the CYP2C9-mediated product, (S)-7-hydroxywarfarin. METHODS: Patients aged >or=18 years with folic acid deficiency who were receiving long-term treatment with a stable dosage of warfarin were studied prospectively, before and 30 to 60 days after the initiation of supplementation with folic acid. Warfarin dosage and international normalized ratio (INR) were documented, and the formation clearance of (S)- and (R)-7-hydroxywarfarin and the oral clearance of (S)- and (R)-warfarin were determined. RESULTS: Twenty-four white patients (14 males; mean (SD) age, 55.0 [19.7] years; body mass index, 30.64 [6.8] kg/m(2)) were enrolled. Treatment with folic acid was associated with a significantly increased mean (SD) formation clearance of (S)-7-hydroxywarfarin (1.096 [0.816] vs 1.608 [1.302] mL/min; P = 0.048). Before folic acid supplementation, the mean (SD) warfarin dosage was 5.98 (2.12) mg/d, and the INR was 2.51 (0.55). During supplementation, the warfarin dosage was 6.17 (2.31) mg/d and the INR was 2.63 (0.65) (both, P = NS vs before supplementation). CONCLUSIONS: Folic acid supplementation was associated with significantly increased formation clearance of (S)-7-hydroxywarfarin. Changes in warfarin dosage requirements and INR were nonsignificant.